UFOs and The New Physics
The Starship Builders
The Sarfatti Letters
StarDrive Discussion Group
International Space Sciences Organization
International Fighter Pilots Association
Email Dr. Jack Sarfatti
The Many Universes of Dr. Fred Alan Wolf
The StarDrive Library
The Physics Chanteuse |
Vigier 2000 Conference
U.C. Berkeley
Thursday, August 24, 2000
Professor Fotini Pallikari, University of Athens, co-author of
Biological Utilization of Quantum Nonlocality with Brian Josephson, made
a startling announcement. Based upon my suggestion to her some years
ago, that mental action from humans should make quantum random processes
nonrandom in the specific context of the Hurst exponent for colored
noise deviating from 1/2 its Brownian motion value, presented PEAR data
showing such a shift beyond statistical error from PEAR experiments at
Princeton. This is a post-quantum feedback-control loop between the
mental deBroglie-Bohm quantum information pilot-field and the10^18
material brain caged electrons entangling with quantum events in an
external electrical circuit IMO. Saul-Paul Sirag compared Pallikari's
report with Eddington's measurement of the bending of starlight by the
Sun testing Einstein's general relativity in 1918 in Africa.
Wolfgang Rindler gave an eloquent defense of Big Bang theory. J.V.
Narlikar gave an eloquent defense of C-field creation theory in a steady
state. Some popular confusions need to be cleared up.
1. The steady state NO BIG BANG alternative to the standard BIG BANG
model still requires Einstein's special and general relativity as its
conceptual basis.
2. Hal Puthoff confirmed to me that both the origin of inertia from
acceleration drag of a charge through the zero point vacuum fluctuations
and the vacuum polarization model of gravity would completely collapse
if Einstein's special relativity mathematics were violated. That is the
Lorentz group SO(1,3) is necessary.
3. Narlikar showed that these zero point fluctuations in particular, and
all quantum random spontaneous emissions in general, such as the PEAR
data Fotini presented, have their origin in future absorbers in which
"Everything is particles." (Wheeler)
4. Bo Lehnert showed several electromagnetic anomalies that I think are
explained by Corum's anholonomic field. That is there are several lab
scale electromagnetic experiments which show the presence of anholonomic
fields from the unseen dimensions of hyperspace. This is in addition to
Shipov's claims on the "inertoid", and in addition to the claims of
M-theorists in Aug. 2000 Scientific American. These two conferences ISSO
Torsion and Vigier 2000 funded by Joe Firmage are producing a very
revolutionary paradigm-shattering synthesis in the foundations of
physics.
5. R Kiehn showed how the arrow of time, irreversibility, is essentially
a nonstatistical topology-changing process. This is consistent with the
Bohm quantum ontology in which quantum randomness is not fundamental but
arises as an artifact of low nonlocal entanglement complexity systems
that do obey usual quantum probability laws. The key parameter in
Kiehn's theory, based on Cartan's differential forms, is the topological
Pfaffian dimension. Pfaffian dimensions 1,2 are Laplacian deterministic.
Pfaffian dimension 3 allows deterministic chaos. Pfaffian dimension 4 is
topology-changing irreversibility, arrow of time, beyond the
diffeomorphisms of Einstein's general relativity to Kleinert's
super-tetrads and I suspect Corum's anholonomic field showing the
practical intrusion of hyperspace into ordinary phenomena.
|