Ok, I'm here, too.

What happens next?

.

Ringolivio- Thinking then hearing and/or seeing someone or thing, especially after a long time. As with other typologies these can 'collaborate' to overlay with other types. The Enterance and exit of a person or thing at an appropriate interval.

Ad Aperterum- (Librum, ME Dia, etc) Wherever it openned. Usually the eyeballs and/or ears (the pose of the body) focus automotive mechanically upon the 'precise answer' to a question just asked, delivered by the external object(s) as if part of the same coherent light. A classic example which also demonstrates an exhilaration (of synchronistic logo therapy) is the Jung Scarabeid set of coincidents. Ad aperturum librum sometimes referred to as library or angel type.

Due- Just in the nick of time. From Due Ex Mechanica. Saving from some inevitable doom at the last trump. Classic example: ABrAHAm about to stab and burn his son as an offering of obedience to the Lord when just in the nick of time a goat goaded Abraham into putting two and two together, thus saving from the inevitably of the alternative sequence.

Numbers - Notable numbers that appear to reinforce some acknowledgement, affirmation, guiding or reschuffling. Includes Paul Kammerer's list in his
"Das Gestetz Der Serie" (Law of Series or 'when it rains it pours')

License Plates- Random visualizations that appear into the cocktail phenomena which have a consideration for the current state of the perciever.

Serenedippity - Fortunate type of synchronicity that seems to propel one into a remarkably favourable set of circumstances.

Religious experiences - Although even the most trivial coincidents can offer an insight, classical examples can be found in Biblical accounts. One such 'religious
interpretation' is the greeting of Mary by Elizabeth when she proclaims that when she greeted Mary, the babe leaped for joy in her womb.

Acoustical Knots - Usually an external set of objects combine sound to 'naturally' form a Feeling Intuition Thinking Sensing cross connection. Emotively can penetrate
our psyche as humourous or even fearful. A specific example is an onomatopoia type. The following poem captures an actual occurence as a demonstration:

Buzzing Mosquito
glides down royal spiral lands
on words 'tinkle, buzz'.

Surrounding world in the 1970's inside a 10 X 12 room. Some books on a table, including an open unabridged dictionary with other open books including Piere de Chardin's discussion of a noosphere, Minkowski's spiraling world points, Jung's synchronicity, etc. Heard a buzz, looked up and saw a small mosquito glide down as if in perfect spiral landing 'just so' into the definition of onomatopoia on top of 'tin' in the word tinkle.

Names - Consideration for the Propensity and/or 'ironies' of a name. Examples include real life cross connections between an occupation or acts and a persons name. Choosing names to express one's work in life was a common practice. We now usually have enough luxury of time to accomodate this practice. There are too many examples to note here, but the language of 'noospeak' addresses the issue.


Reschuffling - Series of 'mishaps' or changes that alter one's usual course. Can preshadow an upcoming synthesis.

Pauli effect - Not to be confused with the Pauli exclusion principle. Examples of the physicist Wolfgang Pauli as a 'whip of God' or 'terrible Pauli' because 'things would happen when he is 'around' the area.

Multi Headed Dragon- Two or more objects acting to fall into an Ark type groove. The centrifuge of the complex steers us into an uncontrollable series of chaotic events and/or correlations. The way out is to jump from an enharmonic modality into another. Spirit and flesh are two different mathematical considerations. Man is no better than a number when it refers to the monistic values. Example is the description of itself as a 'speed beyond mass' and 'flesh of man'. That a 'name' is able to describe a gruesome or wonderous saving light has different thresholds of its existence and ability to describe such actualities.

For the flesh to be able to have a one to one relationship as the sun, the flesh
would first have to be devoured by fire and transform beyond its boundaries, thereby flesh as a numerical expression falls short of describing the sun.

In a symbollic sense, the themes of existence, changings from conception into actualization are recurring throughout microcosmic sparticles. Comparing our existence with other than the sun, say the analogy of a flower, we may find relative 'good' and 'bad' cause and effect. The consequences are reliable, even if not intended.

So, if the Ark type is utilizing a physical example to point out an idea of a pattern that crystallizes into an actual documentable historical cluster, we
should consider how it would reflect if this were a description of our destruction.

However, Noos is optimistic. The stern Animus PLOTinUS Nous has less concern for the plight of flesh. There are to be Multi Headed dragons because all things good and evil are set upon the system of things. Not withstanding the optimistic advocations for eternal existence, flesh adjusts its modality in the hopes that
life is not in vain. But it does rain upon both the good and the wicked. There is collatoral damage in a world that includes the casting of these darkenned patterns.

Caverous CU, a void that God has made for the day of Evil. God made evil and the good. God is beyond good and evil. Pro 16:4 "Yea, God made the wicked for the day of evil." Job has the task of choosing between going past our thresholds.

The cliffs and oceans that were made as good, when choosing to jump into either is bad. The consequence for the sequence usually ends up suicidal. Many analogies can be used to demonstrate how God created a sector that is good upon itself, but when the factor of a body, such as flesh tests the might between each, the good sector
is now darkenned to fullfill an example of bad.

We choose between relative good and evil. God created All Things, including evil. The point is not so much that God created Evil, but that we have the freedom of choice to choose between the consequences relative to our existence.

The lesson of the Bible, of course, is the victory of a "Good" in spite of "Evil"
that superscedes the flesh. The freedom of choice that Job requires is a trial. He is caught between apparant 'pals', strange bedfellows if vanity overtakes the perception of man. Each frame (MINKosSKIan included) can demonstrate a simultaneous 'present' that includes the 'past' and 'future' that appears to have vanished or not yet appeared from the context driven relative positions. Time is simultaneous from an admittedly simplistic view of a multi dimesional film strip.

But each and every iota has a place, even if the totality of the freedom of choice
does not shine through the jaspers, rubies mirrored in the maze of ephemeral
gems that are there yet not.

We are detailed in such a way that every thought, word and deed has an universal accounting. Each iota is as if caught a gigantic wave in a snapshot.


There are more.

MINKowSKI's Multi dimensional world-point coordinate system can be 'visualized', he admits as a simplistic film.

Imagine, through the cyberspace, we have an imaginary set of frames that
are perfect descriptions of itself packed into a neat sets. For us,
chronologic cause and effect is a reliable measure of relative time.

In cyberspace, we can consider both Leibniz and Hume because the aggregates
of monads are present, even if they are not 'presented' in a way that we
can be convinced of their existence.

If the film is stretched into a fine thread, the world is actually flat and it
becomes the sun, a projector, that no longer is the big yellow dot in the sky, but
a locator.

In a sense, things just kind of hang there together acausally, ready to be summoned.

'Past' and 'Future', like a HollyWooded film strip/script are 'present' simultaneously. It is just a matter where the lamp is shining.

The frames are always there. But for flesh and its intellect, 'past' has simply vanished and the 'future' has not yet appeared.

Hubble Telescope proved that space is being created faster than the velocity of light. This means that the 'future' (that which has not happened) already exists
before the cause has reached the effect).

I feel that even though Minkowski admitted that his film discussion is a simplistic model, it helps grasp our relation between existence and non existence.

"Memory" means expansion.

For a scientific experiment, gather a bunch of mirrors set up in different configurations in dark rooms. Bounce a beam of light so that you can see if the
'same thing' is present when you scan back the same precise angle.

The variety of reflections are amazing. It is as though the beam of light shines upon the pre existent imaginary paths finding something that is there, even if not
visited by the beam of light.

Here is a conjecture far from my ability to prove, let alone enough knowledge to
even be able to think about sorts of 'dark energy.' In a so called 'filmstrip' having multi dimensional possibilities, the 'in between' each modalitized frame
has propensity and a paradoxical existence - non existent state simultaneously
pre existent simply waiting for the light beam to re enter the mazes of possible
paths within a maze of mirrored jaspers and rubies. Wherin there are many passage ways into mansions each with rooms that we have lived and returned to a home-coming weeping for joy. Eternal life revisted as if perostroika'd, created from nothing, even destroyed and reconstructed.

The various paths of light represent a 'present'. All things are there with or without that light beam. It is something other than the projected beam that holds the imaginary scenes exactly where they always had been. We turn the strong flash light a little this way or that and the moving sequences are illuminated.

We return and find that the same thing that was there is still there, even at a different time. The 'in between' of that coherent light beam is dark with the
'skip patterns' between so called 'frames'.

Let us reason that we can utilize light to capture frame by frame time
strobe simply captures each physical iota of change to appear as if motionless.

Then let us suppose IF, a really BIG IF there is a 'refresh' of cyber space where the filmstrip expresses itself with fractals of recurring themes.

Closed systems would self consumate in apparent equivalents. Copies of itself in various configured sets would be dissipated. Modalities of hermenuetic circles would co exist. Operations like synchronicity can be implemented right under everyone's eyes says Ferdinand Gonseth, Professor of Higher Mathematics in his Time and Method.

The 'filmstrip' can be edited. Not unlike cartoons, turning people into animated gleichartigeits, equivalences between our physical acts, even to the uncanny
casting of names are held hostage. The control of the material world during the
manifestation of a collective noos can have bitter consequences upon the affected.

The mere presence of a collective 'word' can turn the reflected creations into
non existence. Therefore, there are 'holding places' in the imaginary will of
the world. Those are the 'frames', the 'holding places'.
The 'in between', the uncertain or certain sounds transitioning one frame to another is part of my imaginary mentality about dark energy, which I admittedly know nothing about. And for that matter, I don't if anything I write makes any sense to anyone because it almost appears to me as some sort of private language. Thank God, Biblically a strange language not interpreted is still between the writer and God. But it is a good thing to fellowship and interpret. (Corinthians - about strange languages).

Yet in the MINKowSKIan Fabric the idea that there is a TRUE LIGHT is still within the Holy Script Tours of the Film.

So here goes my optimistic cheers:


High above the Filmstrip Waves
Waives Eternal Light ...