"Jack, Horus, the Hawk-headed God, the "All Seeing Eye" - depicted in ancient art - i.e. Sumerian, Assyrian, Babylonian, Egyptian, as a 'winged 'winged eye.' In Persian art, the 'Eye' is replaced by Ahura Mazda who is seen to be riding in a winged chariot. Forget what Von-Daniken and Sitchin are making of these works of art - saying that they are depictions of "spacecraft" - how amusing when you know the truth - especially when one has experienced it for him or herself."
[Jack]
Why forget it? Maybe they were "spacecraft". My contact in 1953 explicitly used the word "spacecraft". I do not think we should prematurely reject any alternative as yet. Both may be true.
[Mark & Gary]
"The 'Winged Eye' symbolises a natural metafunction that we all have. It is the ability to access the Psi field via..."
[Jack]
Wait. We are Psi fields! Our minds are Psi fields. What you mean, perhaps, is our innate ability to link up with, to entangle with other Psi fields attached to other material brains X, or maybe even the Psi field in the quantum foam perhaps? In quantum theory this nonlocal linking of the mental Psi fields does no local good because of signal-locality. You cannot locally decode any useful information from the mind link. That all changes in post-quantum theory. The Radin-Bierman "presponse" cannot happen in quantum theory, only in post-quantum theory.
[Mark]
"...what the shaman experiences - as 'ecstasis.' (Conscious access and control of the Hypnogogic State.)The wings depicted symbolise one's ability to "fly out of one's corporeal body" as a pin-point of consciousness symbolised by the eye. In effect, during one's conscious access of the Hypnogogic and if one can sustain it, one's consciousness will reduce down to a point of singularity. If I'm reading your theory correctly, this would be akin to accessing the Psi-field consciously."
[Jack]
No you are not understanding me. You ARE a Psi-field. You are not something else that accesses a Psi-field. Your consciousness is an excitation in the Psi-field that you ARE! This conscious excitation of your Psi field is induced from back-action from your material brain configuration at the SET qubit level inside the hydrophobic cages of the tubulin most likely.
[Mark]
"So then, the All Seeing Eye is associated with one being the 'sentient non-local signal.' One becomes omnipotent, omniscient . . . omnipresent."
[Jack]
Nice trick if you can do it. How would you know if you suceeded? How would we know?
[Mark & Gary]
"One can therefore access the 'dreamtime' - which is akin to a bio-organic virtual reality system, which connects us all in a singular unity."
[Jack]
I know about Aborigine "dream time". What is happening is that The Shaman, in any culture (e.g., Carlos Castenada "Don Juan" even if fiction makes the point), entangles with a larger Psi field and is able to decode messages from that larger Psi field because of post-quantum signal-nonlocality (violating quantum theory!). The Shaman can experience "the other's" experiences. Merlin was able to do that. So was my alleged ancestor Rashi de Troyes. Merlin could entangle with the Eagle in flight and experience what the Eagle experienced looking down. How could Merlin do that? Easy, signal-nonlocality! We all have it. We simply have to remember how to use it. It's now a lost art. Powerful men among us like Marshall Naify use it all the time. Marshall has a well developed phenomenology of this. He calls it the "subjective mind opening the Third Eye" using the "identity of opposites" (i.e., qubit superpositions) in "as above, so below" (i.e. the Carlo Suares Cabalistic diagram that is the action-reaction loop including the "holon" (Koestler) fractal structure of the mental post-quantum landscape subject to "catastrophic" topology-changing phase transitions described by Saul-Paul Sirag)
[Mark]
"No doubt there are those who know how to do this quite naturally and have worked upon this understanding in relation to creating a Psi technology. They would be able to go where they will. They would be quite adept at accessing other people's dreams: travelling into the past ..."
[Jack]
Yes, I did that once at least with Marshall Naify as my guide.
[Mark]
"...and into the future, contacting other intelligences along with shapeshifting - as one is pure energy/information. This ability is asociated with the "Angeloi" of myth."
[Jack]
Moscow physicist, George Ryazanov, a former associate of Sakharov, has been formalizing this.
[Mark]
"One can access - consciously - the correspondence system within the dream-state or trance through 'ecstasis' in order to manipulate the associative symbol system and therefore the information energy which in turn will affect matter - i.e. piloting it."
[Jack]
Yes, this part of what you say makes a bit of sense. The rest of it did not. The "wheels within wheels" (Ezekial, Merkabah, Hurtigs "Keys of Enoch" channeled with Puharich?, Sual-Paul's opera?), the loops within loops, a higher level loop tweaks a lower and vice versa. The post-quantum feedback control loop turns in on itself, it has a fractal structure in which different levels influence each other something like Arthur Koestler's "holon" model. I think of it as sentient turbulence. The quantum field superpotential in Bohm theory has this quality - at least partly.
[Mark]
"Conclusion: The All Seeing Eye (the Winged Eye) (The Hawk) and Bird symbolism perse from various ancient cultures who have the understanding of shamanistic techniques are alluding to the metafunction which we all have and which enables us to experience 'ecstasis.'"
[Jack]
Yes, that makes sense.
[Mark]
"For example the shaman utilises the symbol of the bird or Hawk to awaken this metafunction - say for example through 'lucid dreaming,' the bird seen in the dream will awaken him or her, and so therefore the individual will experience ecstasis. ... "
[Jack]
The mental pilot field may well manipulate material inertia - yes. But not the way you try to model it. Leave that to me. Colonel Corso said that flying saucers fly bcause of the mental manipulation of material inertia. This was also said to me by Brendan O Regan and by George Koopman on separate occasions in the period 1973 to 1977.
[Mark]
"The phoenix is associated with fire - the Inner Fire - i.e. the Kundalini phenomena. The Kundalini Fire being the energy released from one pattern into a new pattern - experienced as the "bright-white-light" phenomena."
[Jack]
"Fire in the Belly" (sam Keen?). General George Patton's love of combat. Patton, of course, was a Shaman. Francis Ford Copolla makes that vividly clear in his movie.
[Mark]
"Jack, you experienced phenomena associated with the Kundalini during your experience in 1953 - initiating a new pattern."
[Jack]
Yes, obviously. That is a fact. That is an "iron post of observation in a paper mache" (Wheeler) of speculation on the meaning of history. "Who are we. Where did we come from? What are we? Where are we heading? Why?" I remember this from a Cornell History Professor in my frosh year in 1956.
[Mark]
"Strange that all this Hawk and Horus symbolism associated with SPECTRA is part of your life."
[Jack]
Another fact. We need to respect the facts. These are significant facts for the meaning of history.
[Mark]
"You mention Steven Hawking - who incidentely has worked on 'blackhole theory' featuring 'points of singularity.' Is this Jungian synchronicity?"
[Jack]
Obviously the fact that I heard Steven Hawking's cold metallic computer voice on the telephone in 1953 saying it was a computer on board a spacecraft and that I was to link up with "the others"(Puharich, Geller, Einhorn, the SRI gang etc...) in "twenty years" is a significant fact since in fact that obviously did happen and is still happening. Now we have this English book "The Star Gate Conspiracy" about all this coming out. I have not been able to find it in San Francisco.
[Mark]
"[The Hawk] is not a symbol of an advanced intelligent "spacecraft" - but a symbol of those intelligences who are extremely advanced in the arena of psi-tech and who can consciously utilise the non-local signal at a collective level pertaining to their understanding."
[Jack]
Yes, this is increasingly obvious. This is why Ron Pandolfi, who according to the New York Times, is sometime Chief Scientist of the Central Intelligence Agency (before the China-nuclear secrets bruhaha) is on this list, and he is monitoring these communications as well he should with my full cooperation. At least CIA is doing something right! :-) Ron's current strictly "unoffical", of course, job monitoring me and my network me is the most important thing the CIA is doing IMHO. My relation to the power structure is not unlike Rashi's to Godfrey, or Samuel's to Pope Julius II, or Margherita's to her Master etc. The pattern in history is obvious to anyone who is not blinded by mechanistic knee-jerk false skepticism. See below for more details explaining what I just said.
[Mark]
"This is why this intelligence or intelligences can easily access someone and awaken the same ability in the individual - or make him or her aware of it - advancing our evolution at an individual level - which of course will have a knock-on-effect at the collective level."
[Jack]
You need post-quantum signal nonlocality to do that. In quantum theory you cannot control what Einstein called "spooky telepathic action at a distance". In post-quantum theory you can and do. Big difference."
[Mark]
"The individual's understanding of the intelligence contacting them will be determined by the individual's internal dialogue."
[Jack]
True.
[Mark]
"The internal dialogue of the individual will determine how much energy/information will be accessed to make these changes - not only in the individual himself - but also in the collective. of course the information can be wrongly interpreted - i.e. "aliens," "angels," "devils," etc., but can also be utilised and manipulated by the intelligence concerned."
[Jack]
Good Mark. You are getting warmer. You are getting closer to the Mark. :-) You are beginning to lock on to the target. Get ready to squeeze that Cosmic Trigger - on my mark. The countdown begins ..... :-)
[Mark]
"In regards to the "other intelligence" it will work with one's internal dialogue - leading one step by step, in order to reformulise it, so that one can attain a greater understanding. The reason why this process is taking one step at a time, is because should the internal dialogue be shattered, the individual concerned will access too much information at once. One's internal dialogue then, acts as a filter for this new information, and this is why the information is prone to distortion and misinterpretation because of this filter system: it acts as a protective mechanism for the individual and the consensus. The dismemberment experience of the shaman ... "
[Jack]
Orpheus, Baphomet, The Head of John The Baptist, The Templars -- Rashi des Troyes? Luna, Holly, Marcia Moore, Franklin, Bentov, Jean Nadal, Truffaut, Nelson Rockefeller, Pagels, Koopman, Chipman, Puharich ??? It's like "Ten Little Indians" by Alfred Hitchcock.
[Mark]
"...as has been noted - is similar to the abduction phenomena. The individual being "dismembered" or operated upon, is in essence internal dialogue, which in turn will incorporate an extra element which will allow the individual - once he or she is reformulated - to access new abilities - new metafunctions - making an evolutionary leap."
[Jack]
Watch for those "transcription errors" in post-quantum teleportation (Michael Crichton's "Timeline". [Mark]
"This is also passed down genetically. The dismemberment experience is the fragmentation of the old pattern and the formulation of the new pattern. This again is related to the Kundalini experience, and this is why in many abductees accounts there is mention of energy traveling up and down the spine, and many other associated sensations pertaining to the experience of the Kundalini."
[Jack]
Yes, I remember that very vividly from 1953.
[Mark]
"All the motifs are here in the above - i.e. the bird symbolism - but this is again a misinterpretation of the symbolic motif. One could say that this symbolic motif is now acting as a reference point in relation to and future point in time - in the context of a future and past Psi-technology. For example Horus being the past - SPECTRA being the future, and we are now caught within the mid-point - trying to come to an understanding and utilisation of a metafunction that we once had at a more collective level - and will in no doubt acquire again."
[Jack]
Good! Very good! I like that Horus as past, SPECTRA as future. Midpoint yes. This is what Fred Alan Wolf discovered empirically in the Libet brain data. I agree with his empirics but not his theorisingsince he has not yet escaped the quantum box that Bohr imprisoned his mind in.
[Mark & Gary]
"Explanation of the Ennead "The Nine" will be given in another letter.
Regards,
Mark and Gary.
[Jack]
Note that Michael Crichton in "Timeline" goes back to 14th Century France. Quite a coincidence. Rashi of course is 11 th Century France and my name literally means "The Frenchman" in Hebrew. That "Frenchman" as everyone knows was "Rashi des Troyes". In fact there are great parallels mystically and politically between me and my alleged ancestor which scholars will write about no doubt. Note that I use "alleged" we cannot know for sure of course, but the correlations, the Jungian synchronicities are curious and impossible to ignore if one is intellectually honest.
"Lawrence B. Crowell" wrote:
"According to Heschel, Rashi was Shlomo Itzhaki, or Solomon Bar Isaac. This is further substantiated by other Jewish scholars. I can find no reference to his name as ha-Zarfati. In any case I am sure that you are no reincarnation of Rashi."
[Jack]
I have as much claim to reincarnation to Rashi as the Dali Lama has to reincarnation or as any Shaman has for that matter. That may be no claim at all, of course, since the only way reincarnation can be true is if my version of post-quantum physics with signal-nonlocality is true. That's the interesting new idea here.
That Rashi de Troyes was known as "Zarfati" ("The Frenchman") is well known. I first found out about this from David Padwa, my distant cousin, in 1980. David is in "Be Here Now" by Ram Dass. He is the rich American with the Land Rover. He also allegedly brought the Dali Lama to America for the CIA according to Beat Poet, Gregory Corso, who knew him in Greenwich Village. The well known surrealist scholar, Phillip LaMantia from Lawrence Ferlinghetti's book store City Lights in San Francisco's North Beach, led me to the book in which it is written:
"he was called R. Solomon by the Jews of France, and R. Salomon ha-Zarfati(the Frenchman) by Jews outside of France (p.33)... According to a rather wide-spread legend, Rashi stood in intimate relations with one of the principal chiefs of the Crusade... Godfrey of Bouillon (p.68)"
- RASHI, Maurice Liber Szold trans.(Jewish Publication Society, 1906)
This book also describes (p.p.68-69)Rashi's precognition or "remote viewing" of Godfrey's fate in the war against the Saracens in Jerusalem. Godfrey said to Rashi (Zarfati)
"I see that your wisdom is great. I should like to know whether I shall return from my expedition victorious or whether I shall succumb. Speak without fear."
Zarfati replied:
"Thou wilt take the Holy City and thou wilt reign over Jerusalem three days, but on the fourth day the Moslem will put thee to flight, and when thou returnest only three horses will be left to thee."
Godfrey, angered by Zarfati's prophecy, reneges on his promise and threatens to kill all the Jews of France
"if return with only one more horse than thou sayest."
Godfrey's fourth horse died at the Gates of Troyes according to ancient legend and the Jews were saved.
In a section "THE GRAIL AND CABALISM" (p.274-5 of "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" by M. Baigent, R. Leigh and H Lincoln, Delecorte, 1982) I find:
"the Grail is an initiatory experience... a 'transformation' ... or 'altered state of consciousness' ... a "Gnostic experience,' a 'mystical experience,' 'illumination,' or 'union with God'. It is possible to ... place the experiential aspect of the Grail in a very specific context ... the Cabala ... it would hardly seem coincidental that there was such a school at Troyes. It dated from 1070 - Godfroi de Bouillon's time - and was conducted by one Rashi, perhaps the most famous of medieval Cabalists."
Now I am not sure how accurate that last remark is because Encyclopedia Judaica says:
SARFATI (Zarefati, Sarfatti), name frequently given to Jews originating from France, e.g., ABRAHAM SARFATI, who emigrated to Catalonia, author of Tamid ha-Shahar; JOSEPH BEN MOSES SARFATI, mathematician; and ISAAC HA-SHAHAR who emigrated to the Fast. The most important family often bearing the additional surname of Sarfati was the Trabot or Trabotti family, who probably originated from Trevoux (France) and came to Italy in the second half of the 15th century. A Sarfaty family were rabbis of Fez (Morocco) for several generations (16th-18th centuries).
SAMUEL SARFATI, called Gallo (d. c. 1519), a physician originating from Provence, settled in Rome in 1498. He represented the Jewish community at the coronation of Pope Julius II (1503) and a year later became the personal physician to the Pope, who confirmed the privileges granted him by Pope Alexander Vl, including permission to attend Christian patients, exemption from wearing the Jewish badge, and Papal Protection for him and his family. In 1515 he became physician of Giuliano de' Medici. Samuel's son Joseph, called Josiphon, Giosifante, or Giuseppe Gallo (d. 1577), was a physician, philosopher, poet, and mathematician. An accomplished Iinguist, he had a good knowledge of Hebrew, Aramaic, Arabic, Greek, and Latin. The Pope extended to him the privileges that had been accorded to his father; these were confirmed by Pope Leo X and Pope Clement VII in 1524. Joseph translated into Hebrew the Spanish comedy Celestina. He survived remarkable adventures, assisted David Reubeni, and died as the result of his sufferings during the sack of Rome.
ISAAC SARFATI was physician to Pope Clement Vll (1523-34), who reconfirmed his right to the family's privileges.
SAMUEL SARFATY (16th century) was a printer in Rome.
JOSEPH SARFATl (16th century), a rabbi of Fez, converted to Christianity. Adopting the name of his godfather Pope Julius III (1550-55), Andrea del Monte, he became a violent anti-Jewish preacher. One of his sermons was heard by Michel de Montaigne. Sarfati was one of the instigators of the condemnation of the Talmud and its burning in Rome in 1553.
JACOB BEN SOLOMON SARFATY (14th century), a physician, was born in northern France. On the expulsion of the Jews he moved to Avignon in the second half of the 14th century. He was the author of Mishkenot Ya’akov (extant in Ms.), a work divided into three books: Beit Ya’akov, allegorical interpretations of some passages of the Pentateuch: Yeshu’ot Ya’akov, a discourse on the plagues of Egypt: and Kehillat Ya’akov, a theological exposition of the laws given on Mount Sinai. In a supplement, Evel Rabbati, he describes the deaths of his three sons who perished in the course of three months during the plague of 1395. He also wrote a medical treatise on migraine.
Bibliography: U. Cassuto, Gli Ebrei a Firenze nell' Eta del Rinascimento (1918): Hirschberg, Afrikah, 2 (1965), 156-8, 246-9.
SARFATY, family of rabbinic scholars in Fez, Morocco. According to a family tradition, the Sarfatys are descendants of Rabbenu Tam. R. Solomon, rabbi in Majorca, is mentioned in the responsa of R. Isaac bar Sheshet. A branch of the Family settled in Fez. ISAAC (d. c. 1600) was dayyan in Fez. Some of his commentaries on biblical verses are quoted by his son Vidal in his works. Vida ha-Sarfaty (c. 1550-1620) was referred to as ''senior" and described as hasid (“pious"). He was a disciple of K. Abraham Uzziel.
His commentaries are outstanding for their originality: he quotes the Zohar and appears to have been a kabbalist. Many of the works of Spanish rabbis are cited in his works. Sarfaty's writings included: Derekh ha-Kodesh, a commentary to the Sifra (1908); Megillat Sefarim, on Esther, Ruth, and Lamentations; and Ozar Nehmad, on Psalms (both works were published in Amsterdam in 1718 under the title Zuf Devash); Imrei Yosher (1874), a commentary on Midrash Rabbah, and notes on R. Elijah Mizrahi which were included in Samuel Sarfaty's Nimmukei Shemu’el (Amsterdam, 1718).